My search of hybrid courses reflected in finding a course in the nursing school which is focused on building skills and knowledge that is required to design and implement nursing interferences at advanced levels. Relevant concepts, theories, and research to support the development and implementation of nursing interventions for advanced practice are explored. After reading the course description, I came to the conclusion that, although interesting, this course is very different than the experiences had in LIS 201.
Our class utilized technology and the online aspect to enhance our face-to-face meetings. These other hybrid courses and online components seem to detract from the present lectures with peers and professors. Although very progressive and technologically savvy, I don't think that it is the best route to go, especially with the nursing realm.
My understanding of technology was certainly enhanced throughout the course, but I don't think that it was the best way of learning for me throughout the semester. I found it much more beneficial to be present in every lecture and discussion section to talk about the ideas with my peers. Face-to-face interaction seems to be more "hands on" and that is the environment that I thrive in.
Personally, I think it would be beneficial for educators and universities to steer clear from this automated society. The generation we live in is already automated enough that technology will be learned about eventually on our own. To enforce it through a class is almost enforcing this idea of robotics. I don't think that I would like to see this type of thing progress any further. I stated this in my Ignite presentation, and I identified with it in Professor Downey's example of Wal-E. I would hate for that society to become our reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment